From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack"
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:33:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483990423.2106.14.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483985224.21472.3.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 10:07 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:59 -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
[]
> > Facepalm...
[]
> We are in 2017. Whatever was said in 2013 is irrelevant.
Unless you morph into the PEOTUS, as a
general statement, this is untrue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-09 15:03 [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 15:04 ` [net-next PATCH 1/3] Revert "icmp: avoid allocating large struct on stack" Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 17:42 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-09 17:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 17:59 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-09 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 18:52 ` David Miller
2017-01-09 20:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-10 18:06 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 18:12 ` David Miller
2017-01-10 18:44 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 18:48 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 18:54 ` David Miller
2017-01-12 22:46 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 20:08 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-10 21:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-12 22:21 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-10 21:41 ` Joe Perches
2017-01-09 19:33 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-01-10 18:01 ` Cong Wang
2017-01-09 18:47 ` David Miller
2017-01-09 17:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 15:04 ` [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-11 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-06-04 7:11 ` Florian Weimer
2017-06-04 14:38 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-06-05 14:22 ` Florian Weimer
2017-01-09 15:04 ` [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: for rate-limited ICMP replies save one atomic operation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-09 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 17:43 ` [net-next PATCH 0/3] net: optimize ICMP-reply code path Cong Wang
2017-01-09 17:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-09 20:49 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483990423.2106.14.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).