netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] net: remove member 'max' of struct scm_fp_list
@ 2017-02-10 12:11 yuan linyu
  2017-02-10 15:25 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: yuan linyu @ 2017-02-10 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller; +Cc: netdev, yuan linyu

From: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>

SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it.

Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>
---
 include/net/scm.h |  3 +--
 net/core/scm.c    | 20 +++++---------------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
index 59fa93c..1301227 100644
--- a/include/net/scm.h
+++ b/include/net/scm.h
@@ -19,8 +19,7 @@ struct scm_creds {
 };
 
 struct scm_fp_list {
-	short			count;
-	short			max;
+	unsigned int	count;
 	struct user_struct	*user;
 	struct file		*fp[SCM_MAX_FD];
 };
diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c
index b6d8368..53679517 100644
--- a/net/core/scm.c
+++ b/net/core/scm.c
@@ -69,15 +69,7 @@ static int scm_fp_copy(struct cmsghdr *cmsg, struct scm_fp_list **fplp)
 	int *fdp = (int*)CMSG_DATA(cmsg);
 	struct scm_fp_list *fpl = *fplp;
 	struct file **fpp;
-	int i, num;
-
-	num = (cmsg->cmsg_len - sizeof(struct cmsghdr))/sizeof(int);
-
-	if (num <= 0)
-		return 0;
-
-	if (num > SCM_MAX_FD)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	unsigned int i, num;
 
 	if (!fpl)
 	{
@@ -86,18 +78,17 @@ static int scm_fp_copy(struct cmsghdr *cmsg, struct scm_fp_list **fplp)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		*fplp = fpl;
 		fpl->count = 0;
-		fpl->max = SCM_MAX_FD;
 		fpl->user = NULL;
 	}
-	fpp = &fpl->fp[fpl->count];
 
-	if (fpl->count + num > fpl->max)
+	num = (cmsg->cmsg_len - sizeof(struct cmsghdr))/sizeof(int);
+	if (fpl->count + num > SCM_MAX_FD)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/*
 	 *	Verify the descriptors and increment the usage count.
 	 */
-
+	fpp = &fpl->fp[fpl->count];
 	for (i=0; i< num; i++)
 	{
 		int fd = fdp[i];
@@ -112,7 +103,7 @@ static int scm_fp_copy(struct cmsghdr *cmsg, struct scm_fp_list **fplp)
 	if (!fpl->user)
 		fpl->user = get_uid(current_user());
 
-	return num;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void __scm_destroy(struct scm_cookie *scm)
@@ -341,7 +332,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
 	if (new_fpl) {
 		for (i = 0; i < fpl->count; i++)
 			get_file(fpl->fp[i]);
-		new_fpl->max = new_fpl->count;
 		new_fpl->user = get_uid(fpl->user);
 	}
 	return new_fpl;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: remove member 'max' of struct scm_fp_list
  2017-02-10 12:11 [PATCH] net: remove member 'max' of struct scm_fp_list yuan linyu
@ 2017-02-10 15:25 ` David Miller
  2017-02-11  2:04   ` yuan linyu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-02-10 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cugyly; +Cc: netdev, Linyu.Yuan

From: yuan linyu <cugyly@163.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 20:11:13 +0800

> From: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>
> 
> SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>

I don't think so:

> @@ -341,7 +332,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
>  	if (new_fpl) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < fpl->count; i++)
>  			get_file(fpl->fp[i]);
> -		new_fpl->max = new_fpl->count;
>  		new_fpl->user = get_uid(fpl->user);

It's not set the SCM_MAX_FD here, it's set to whatever fpl->count is.

In other words, your patch breaks things.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: remove member 'max' of struct scm_fp_list
  2017-02-10 15:25 ` David Miller
@ 2017-02-11  2:04   ` yuan linyu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: yuan linyu @ 2017-02-11  2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev, Linyu.Yuan

On 五, 2017-02-10 at 10:25 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: yuan linyu <cugyly@163.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 20:11:13 +0800
> 
> > From: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>
> > 
> > SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>
> 
> I don't think so:
> 
> > @@ -341,7 +332,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
> >       if (new_fpl) {
> >               for (i = 0; i < fpl->count; i++)
> >                       get_file(fpl->fp[i]);
> > -             new_fpl->max = new_fpl->count;
> >               new_fpl->user = get_uid(fpl->user);
> 
> It's not set the SCM_MAX_FD here, it's set to whatever fpl->count is.
> 
> In other words, your patch breaks things.
maybe it's not good to "SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it".
actually 'max' field is useless.'count' field is enough.
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-11  2:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-10 12:11 [PATCH] net: remove member 'max' of struct scm_fp_list yuan linyu
2017-02-10 15:25 ` David Miller
2017-02-11  2:04   ` yuan linyu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).