From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, davem@davemloft.net,
stephen@networkplumber.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bridge: fdb: converge fdb_delete_by functions into one
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:59:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486994351-1137-4-git-send-email-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486994351-1137-1-git-send-email-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
We can simplify the logic of entries pointing to the bridge by
converging the fdb_delete_by functions, this would allow us to use the
same function for both cases since the fdb's dst is set to NULL if it is
pointing to the bridge thus we can always check for a port match.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 62 +++++++++++++----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
index da5ed7d0a3c8..4ac11574117c 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
@@ -930,35 +930,10 @@ int br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
return err;
}
-static int fdb_delete_by_addr(struct net_bridge *br, const u8 *addr,
- u16 vid)
-{
- struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb;
-
- fdb = br_fdb_find(br, addr, vid);
- if (!fdb)
- return -ENOENT;
-
- fdb_delete(br, fdb);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __br_fdb_delete_by_addr(struct net_bridge *br,
- const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
-{
- int err;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
- err = fdb_delete_by_addr(br, addr, vid);
- spin_unlock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
-
- return err;
-}
-
-static int fdb_delete_by_addr_and_port(struct net_bridge_port *p,
+static int fdb_delete_by_addr_and_port(struct net_bridge *br,
+ const struct net_bridge_port *p,
const u8 *addr, u16 vlan)
{
- struct net_bridge *br = p->br;
struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb;
fdb = br_fdb_find(br, addr, vlan);
@@ -966,17 +941,19 @@ static int fdb_delete_by_addr_and_port(struct net_bridge_port *p,
return -ENOENT;
fdb_delete(br, fdb);
+
return 0;
}
-static int __br_fdb_delete(struct net_bridge_port *p,
+static int __br_fdb_delete(struct net_bridge *br,
+ const struct net_bridge_port *p,
const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid)
{
int err;
- spin_lock_bh(&p->br->hash_lock);
- err = fdb_delete_by_addr_and_port(p, addr, vid);
- spin_unlock_bh(&p->br->hash_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
+ err = fdb_delete_by_addr_and_port(br, p, addr, vid);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
return err;
}
@@ -989,7 +966,7 @@ int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
struct net_bridge_port *p = NULL;
struct net_bridge_vlan *v;
- struct net_bridge *br = NULL;
+ struct net_bridge *br;
int err;
if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE) {
@@ -1003,6 +980,7 @@ int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
return -EINVAL;
}
vg = nbp_vlan_group(p);
+ br = p->br;
}
if (vid) {
@@ -1012,30 +990,20 @@ int br_fdb_delete(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct nlattr *tb[],
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE)
- err = __br_fdb_delete_by_addr(br, addr, vid);
- else
- err = __br_fdb_delete(p, addr, vid);
+ err = __br_fdb_delete(br, p, addr, vid);
} else {
err = -ENOENT;
- if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE)
- err = __br_fdb_delete_by_addr(br, addr, 0);
- else
- err &= __br_fdb_delete(p, addr, 0);
-
+ err &= __br_fdb_delete(br, p, addr, 0);
if (!vg || !vg->num_vlans)
- goto out;
+ return err;
list_for_each_entry(v, &vg->vlan_list, vlist) {
if (!br_vlan_should_use(v))
continue;
- if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE)
- err = __br_fdb_delete_by_addr(br, addr, v->vid);
- else
- err &= __br_fdb_delete(p, addr, v->vid);
+ err &= __br_fdb_delete(br, p, addr, v->vid);
}
}
-out:
+
return err;
}
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 13:59 [PATCH net-next 0/3] bridge: minor fdb cleanup Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge
2017-02-13 13:59 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] bridge: fdb: converge fdb searching functions into one Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-13 13:59 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] bridge: fdb: add proper lock checks in searching functions Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-13 13:59 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2017-02-14 17:41 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] bridge: minor fdb cleanup David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486994351-1137-4-git-send-email-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).