From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:11:42 +0100
Message-ID: <1487952702.30601.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <20170224101312.31538-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
         <20170224.102817.1987967741498252394.davem@davemloft.net>
         (sfid-20170224_163740_019082_544361B2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, m.nyman@iki.fi, yegorslists@googlemail.com
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, pvorel@suse.cz
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:47432 "EHLO sipsolutions.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750950AbdBXQLs (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:11:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170224.102817.1987967741498252394.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20170224_163740_019082_544361B2)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>


> > Chosen colors are questionable. Best solution would be also allow
> user to
> > redefine colors, like ls does with LS_COLORS or grep with
> GREP_COLORS. But that
> > is maybe overkill.
> 
> I think you may have posted this to the wrong mailing list.

Actually, it seems to just be missing the "iproute" (or so) prefix?

johannes