From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 net-next 1/7] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:22:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490858550-7763-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490858550-7763-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
This patch introduce a batched version of consuming, consumer can
dequeue more than one pointers from the ring at a time. We don't care
about the reorder of reading here so no need for compiler barrier.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 6c70444..2be0f350 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct ptr_ring *r)
return ptr;
}
+static inline int __ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
+ void **array, int n)
+{
+ void *ptr;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ ptr = __ptr_ring_consume(r);
+ if (!ptr)
+ break;
+ array[i] = ptr;
+ }
+
+ return i;
+}
+
/*
* Note: resize (below) nests producer lock within consumer lock, so if you
* call this in interrupt or BH context, you must disable interrupts/BH when
@@ -297,6 +313,55 @@ static inline void *ptr_ring_consume_bh(struct ptr_ring *r)
return ptr;
}
+static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
+ void **array, int n)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock(&r->consumer_lock);
+ ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
+ spin_unlock(&r->consumer_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_irq(struct ptr_ring *r,
+ void **array, int n)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&r->consumer_lock);
+ ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&r->consumer_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_any(struct ptr_ring *r,
+ void **array, int n)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&r->consumer_lock, flags);
+ ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&r->consumer_lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_bh(struct ptr_ring *r,
+ void **array, int n)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&r->consumer_lock);
+ ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&r->consumer_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Cast to structure type and call a function without discarding from FIFO.
* Function must return a value.
* Callers must take consumer_lock.
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 7:22 [PATCH V2 net-next 0/7] vhost-net rx batching Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2017-03-30 13:53 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 1/7] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-31 3:52 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-31 14:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-04-01 5:14 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 2/7] skb_array: " Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 3/7] tun: export skb_array Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 4/7] tap: " Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 5/7] tun: support receiving skb through msg_control Jason Wang
2017-03-30 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-31 4:10 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 6/7] tap: support receiving skb from msg_control Jason Wang
2017-03-30 15:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-31 4:07 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-30 7:22 ` [PATCH V2 net-next 7/7] vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array Jason Wang
2017-03-30 14:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-31 4:02 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-31 6:47 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490858550-7763-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).