From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] netlink: extended error reporting Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 22:27:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1491596832.5800.21.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20170407193550.GA23424@salvia> <20170407.124327.626442219286333933.davem@davemloft.net> <1491594406.5800.18.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20170407.125511.1233528940652477012.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pablo-Cap9r6Oaw4JrovVCs/uTlw@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jiri-rHqAuBHg3fBzbRFIqnYvSA@public.gmane.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170407.125511.1233528940652477012.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 12:55 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > One idea.  We use the macro thing to generate a "netlink.pot" file > and then some userland tree can contain the latest netlink.pot and > the translations. Right. For the record - since we just talked about it - I was thinking of putting it into a special section so that we could easily write a script to generate the pot file from the kernel binary after doing "allyesconfig" or collecting it from modules or so. Thinking of modules though - do we need to adjust the module loading code to load a new section? I'll have to look into that. johannes