Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] netlink: extended ACK reporting

[Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>]

On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 09:26 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/8/17 2:24 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > @@ -2300,14 +2332,35 @@ void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
> > struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err)
> >  			  NLMSG_ERROR, payload, 0);
> >  	errmsg = nlmsg_data(rep);
> >  	errmsg->error = err;
> > -	memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, payload > sizeof(*errmsg) ? nlh-
> > >nlmsg_len : sizeof(*nlh));
> > +	memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh,
> > +	       !(nlk->flags & NETLINK_F_CAP_ACK) ? nlh->nlmsg_len
> > +						 : sizeof(*nlh));
> > +
> 
> generically this makes userspace parsing more problematic: the
> parsing layer may not know if the socket option has been set to
> precisely know the size of errmsg->msg and how much data needs to be
> skipped to get to the new attributes.

Yes, I know. I'd hope that userspace can remember that per socket - I
don't see a good other way to do this.

If we insert the TLVs in front of, or instead of (with a TLV containing
it), the request message then at least libnl's debugging will need to
be changed.

As it is, I can assume that libnl will not set the CAP setting, and
everything works fine even if I don't change libnl, which makes things
easier.

Do you have any better ideas?

johannes