From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ftgmac100: Upgrade to NETIF_F_HW_CSUM Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:06:41 +1000 Message-ID: <1491948401.7236.20.camel@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20170411010436.23290-2-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <7d0f6000-3be5-ed70-49d3-3a3916dd79ff@cogentembedded.com> <1491909225.4166.248.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20170411.112733.1412982560568816717.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:51857 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753740AbdDKWJE (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:09:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170411.112733.1412982560568816717.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:27 -0400, David Miller wrote: > > I'll fix it in a next spin if Dave wants it that way but otherwise > > I'm keen to leave it as it is. > > Please fix this and respin. > > Meanwhile get the coding style rules changed if you disagree with > them.  A patch series review is not the place to argue about your > disagreement with the coding style rules. I will fix. Note that I don't disagree with the rule as stated. However I'd like to point out that the rule doesn't precisely match the construct here as it's for a dangling single else while what I had here is an else if ... so it's open to intepretation :-) I also tend to disagree that coding style rules should be firm laws, imho they should be considered in context and broken if they render a given piece of code less clear. That said, I will respin. Cheers, Ben.