From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] netlink: allow sending extended ACK with cookie on success Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:54:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1492005271.2855.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20170412123408.22012-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20170412123408.22012-4-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20170412134709.GF1952@nanopsycho> (sfid-20170412_154711_878142_644C1B02) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org, Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Benc , David Ahern To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:37306 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752345AbdDLNyd (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:54:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170412134709.GF1952@nanopsycho> (sfid-20170412_154711_878142_644C1B02) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > } else { > > flags |= NLM_F_CAPPED; > > + > > + if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_F_EXT_ACK && > > +     extack && extack->cookie_len) > > + tlvlen += nla_total_size(extack- > > >cookie_len); > > } > > > > Now I see why you have "if (tlvlen)" where you have it :) Ah, you had me wondering with that comment ... Yeah, I'd been developing this by adding patches and then rebasing, so the fact that this could've been elsewhere to start with never crossed my mind. johannes