netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __sk_buff.data_end
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:17:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492697865.3109.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58F8C160.6010905@iogearbox.net>

On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 16:10 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> 
> I think this would be a rather more complex operation on the BPF
> side, it would need changes from LLVM (which assumes initial ctx sits
> in r1), verifier for tracking this ctx2, all the way down to JITs
> plus some way to handle 1 and 2 argument program calls generically.
> Much easier to pass additional meta data for the program via cb[],
> for example.

Yeah, it did seem very complex :)

> > Alternatively I can clear another pointer (u64) in the CB, store a
> > pointer there, and always emit code following that pointer - should
> > be possible right?
> 
> What kind of pointer? If it's something like data_end as read-only,
> then this needs to be tracked in the verifier in addition, of course.
> Other option you could do (depending on what you want to achieve) is
> to have a bpf_probe_read() version as a helper for your prog type
> that would further walk that pointer/struct (similar to tracing)
> where this comes w/o any backward compat guarantees, though.

I meant something like this

struct wifi_cb {
	struct wifi_data *wifi_data;
	...
	void *data_end; // with BUILD_BUG_ON to the right offset
};

Then struct wifi_data can contain extra data that doesn't fit into
wifi_cb, like the stuff I evicted for *data_end and *wifi_data. Let's
say one of those fields is "u64 boottime_ns;" (as I did in my patch
now), so we have

struct wifi_data {
	u64 boottime_ns;
};

then I can still have

struct __wifi_sk_buff {
	u32 len;
	u32 data;
	u32 data_end;
	u32 boottime_ns; // this is strange but
			 // seems to be done this way?
};

And then when boottime_ns is accessed, I can have:

        case offsetof(struct __wifi_sk_buff, boottime_ns):
                off  = si->off;
                off -= offsetof(struct __wifi_sk_buff, boottime_ns);
                off += offsetof(struct sk_buff, cb);
                off += offsetof(struct wifi_cb, wifi_data);
                *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_SIZEOF(void *), si->dst_reg,
                                      si->src_reg, off);
		off = offsetof(struct wifi_data, boottime_ns);
		*isns++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_SIZEOF(u64), si->dst_reg,
				      si->src_reg, off);
                break;

no?

It seems to me this should work, and essentially emit code to follow
the pointer to inside struct wifi_data. Assuming 

johannes

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-20 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-19 21:31 __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-19 22:20 ` __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-20  0:01   ` __sk_buff.data_end Daniel Borkmann
2017-04-20  0:12     ` __sk_buff.data_end Alexei Starovoitov
2017-04-20  0:38       ` __sk_buff.data_end Daniel Borkmann
2017-04-20  6:07         ` __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-20  6:06       ` __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-20  6:01     ` __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-20 14:10       ` __sk_buff.data_end Daniel Borkmann
2017-04-20 14:17         ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2017-04-20 14:28           ` __sk_buff.data_end Daniel Borkmann
2017-04-20 14:32             ` __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-20 14:46               ` __sk_buff.data_end Daniel Borkmann
2017-04-20 14:48                 ` __sk_buff.data_end Johannes Berg
2017-04-19 23:51 ` __sk_buff.data_end Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1492697865.3109.7.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).