From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Rose Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when releasing SKB Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:25:35 -0700 Message-ID: <1492730735.17866.7.camel@gmail.com> References: <1492712723-9350-1-git-send-email-mhjungk@gmail.com> <1492729423.17866.6.camel@gmail.com> <20170420232349.GA25174@fqdn.specialj.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Myungho Jung Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:36847 "EHLO mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S948027AbdDTXZj (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:25:39 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f193.google.com with SMTP id x86so22232760ioe.3 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:25:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170420232349.GA25174@fqdn.specialj.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 16:23 -0700, Myungho Jung wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:03:43PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 11:25 -0700, Myungho Jung wrote: > > > Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree > > > family of functions. > > > > > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195289 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung > > > > Hi, > > > > I think the patch is fine but I'm confused by the subject. You mention > > p54 driver but the change is in dev.c. I know the bugzilla references > > the p54 but that's not where the change is. > > > > Seems odd to me. > > > > - Greg > > > > > --- > > > net/core/dev.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > > > index 7869ae3..22be2a6 100644 > > > --- a/net/core/dev.c > > > +++ b/net/core/dev.c > > > @@ -2450,6 +2450,9 @@ void __dev_kfree_skb_irq(struct sk_buff *skb, enum skb_free_reason reason) > > > { > > > unsigned long flags; > > > > > > + if (unlikely(!skb)) > > > + return; > > > + > > > if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)) { > > > smp_rmb(); > > > atomic_set(&skb->users, 0); > > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > Thank you for checking my patch. I missed that I moved change from p54 > to net/dev. Do I need to resubmit patch v2 to modify subject? > > Thanks, > Myungho Yes, I think that's the best idea. Thanks, - Greg