From: Jamie Bainbridge <jbainbri@redhat.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jamie Bainbridge <jbainbri@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: don't deliver packets with zero length to raw sockets
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:58:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492747124-31821-2-git-send-email-jbainbri@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492747124-31821-1-git-send-email-jbainbri@redhat.com>
IPv6 assumes there is data after the network header and blindly delivers
skbs to raw sockets without checking the presence of data.
With an application in a common loop where it checks select/poll/epoll
then ioctl(SIOCINQ/FIONREAD) is positive before continuing to
recvfrom(), this behaviour can cause the application to loop forever
on ioctl() because there is a zero-length skb to receive.
With this, it is very easy to make a Denial of Service attack by
crafting a packet which declares a Next Header in the IPv6 header but
does not actually supply a transport header and/or payload.
skb->len is already correctly set in ip6_input_finish() with pskb_pull()
so check this length before delivering zero data to raw sockets.
Signed-off-by: Jamie Bainbridge <jbainbri@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv6/raw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/raw.c b/net/ipv6/raw.c
index 0da6a12b5472e322d679572c7244e5c9bc467741..29dfdcefe1cc5f4c082ed919026e49e70320605e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/raw.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static bool ipv6_raw_deliver(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr)
read_lock(&raw_v6_hashinfo.lock);
sk = sk_head(&raw_v6_hashinfo.ht[hash]);
- if (!sk)
+ if (!sk || !(skb->len))
goto out;
net = dev_net(skb->dev);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-21 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-21 3:58 [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: check raw payload size correctly in ioctl Jamie Bainbridge
2017-04-21 3:58 ` Jamie Bainbridge [this message]
2017-04-21 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: don't deliver packets with zero length to raw sockets Sabrina Dubroca
2017-04-21 11:18 ` Jamie Bainbridge
2017-04-21 12:47 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2017-04-21 14:53 ` David Miller
2017-04-22 12:10 ` Jamie Bainbridge
2017-04-21 14:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492747124-31821-2-git-send-email-jbainbri@redhat.com \
--to=jbainbri@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).