From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: [Patch net-next] ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:55:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493240115-779-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place
we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_lock is no longer needed,
we just need to disable BH there.
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index 1d46d05..2923ea1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ int ip_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct ipcm_cookie *ipc,
sent to multicast group to reach destination designated router.
*/
struct ip_ra_chain __rcu *ip_ra_chain;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip_ra_lock);
static void ip_ra_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
@@ -352,21 +351,21 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
new_ra = on ? kmalloc(sizeof(*new_ra), GFP_KERNEL) : NULL;
- spin_lock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+ local_bh_disable();
for (rap = &ip_ra_chain;
- (ra = rcu_dereference_protected(*rap,
- lockdep_is_held(&ip_ra_lock))) != NULL;
+ (ra = rtnl_dereference(*rap)) != NULL;
rap = &ra->next) {
if (ra->sk == sk) {
if (on) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
kfree(new_ra);
return -EADDRINUSE;
}
/* dont let ip_call_ra_chain() use sk again */
ra->sk = NULL;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(*rap, ra->next);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
if (ra->destructor)
ra->destructor(sk);
@@ -381,7 +380,7 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
}
}
if (!new_ra) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
return -ENOBUFS;
}
new_ra->sk = sk;
@@ -390,7 +389,7 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
RCU_INIT_POINTER(new_ra->next, ra);
rcu_assign_pointer(*rap, new_ra);
sock_hold(sk);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ local_bh_enable();
return 0;
}
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-26 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-26 20:55 Cong Wang [this message]
2017-04-27 12:46 ` [Patch net-next] ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock Eric Dumazet
2017-04-27 23:46 ` Cong Wang
2017-04-27 23:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-04-28 16:54 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493240115-779-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).