Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 2/4] leds: pca995x: use device_for_each_child_node() to access device child nodes

[Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>]

On 05/08/2024 18:01, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 05 Aug 2024 16:49:45 +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>>> The iterated nodes are direct children of the device node, and the
>>> `device_for_each_child_node()` macro accounts for child node
>>> availability.
>>>
>>> `fwnode_for_each_available_child_node()` is meant to access the child
>>> nodes of an fwnode, and therefore not direct child nodes of the device
>>> node.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [2/4] leds: pca995x: use device_for_each_child_node() to access device child nodes
>>       commit: 6eefd65ba6ae29ab801f6461e59c10f93dd496f8
> 
> I'm not sure what you rebased onto, but it wasn't LEDs or -next.
> 
> Anyway, I fixed-up the conflicts and pushed.
> 
> The patch should be in -next by tomorrow.
> 
> Please check it to ensure I didn't make any mistakes.
> 

Hi, I rebased onto next-20240805, and its commit ID matches the
base-commit provided in the cover letter (generated by b4). I wonder why
it did not work on your side, but thanks for fixing the conflicts and
applying (I checked it and it looks fine).

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco