From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: make net.core.{r,w}mem_{default,max} namespaced
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 11:33:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501579980.1163602.1059346360.66293F3A@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501571907.1876.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017, at 09:18, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 02:17 -0400, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
> > We do account rmem as well as wmem allocated memory to the apropriate
> > mem_cgs. In theory this should be okay.
>
> Last time I checked, rmem was not memcg ready yet.
>
> Can you describe the details ?
As long as our packets pass __sock_queue_rcv_skb (what we do with udp,
raw, packet) we call down to sk_rmem_schedule, which in
__sk_mem_schedule -> sk_mem_raise_allocated will charge the mem_cg or
suppress the allocation.
For tcp, as I remember from the last discussion, we simply drop packets
and don't handle that very sensible, albeit we should not get out of the
mem_cg limits.
tcp_try_rmem_schedule in front of the ofo as well as the data queue
should make sure of that. Did I overlook anything?
OTOH, I am not too fond of the change. I just think that it shouldn't
deplete memory but rather stall connections.
Thanks,
Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 17:03 [RFC] net: make net.core.{r,w}mem_{default,max} namespaced Matteo Croce
2017-07-28 20:51 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2017-07-31 10:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-01 6:17 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2017-08-01 7:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-01 9:33 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501579980.1163602.1059346360.66293F3A@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=mcroce@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox