From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/mlx4_en: don't set CHECKSUM_COMPLETE on SCTP packets
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 18:06:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502208390.2701.2.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALzJLG-1RLsw68QXbK=wMUYR9KpkcQx6LqQy_b96miTw5mjy4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 18:07 +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > {
> > __u16 length_for_csum = 0;
> > __wsum csum_pseudo_header = 0;
> > + __u8 ipproto = iph->protocol;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(ipproto == IPPROTO_SCTP))
> > + return -1;
> >
>
> Hi Davide
>
hi Saeed,
thank you for looking at this!
> If you got to here then it means this is a non UDP/TCP ipv4 packet and
> the HW failed to validate it's checksum but
> you get from the connectx3 HW a 1's complement 16-bit sum of IP
> Payload + IP pseudo-header.
> so if you return -1 here the driver will report checksum none for this
> packet (and you will abandon any checsum offload/help from HW).
>
> I am not an SCTP expert but it seems that you decided here that
> connectX3 hw checksum (described above) can't be used to calculate
> SCTP packet checksum
> is that correct?
>
Yes, that's correct. SCTP uses CRC32c, not 1's complement (and does not use
pseudo-headers): therefore, the checksum computed by the NIC hardware can't
be used.
The issue I observed is skb->ip_summed set to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, that made
CRC32c validation fail in my setup (that was a netfilter REJECT rule, matching
SCTP packets). AFAIK, CHECKSUM_COMPLETE is valid only for the Internet Checksum;
setting CHECKSUM_NONE on rx packets carrying IPPROTO_SCTP fixed my test scenario.
> If so, then i am ok with this patch.
I planned to post this some weeks ago, after agreeing v2 with Tariq
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg441231.html), but took some time to
find a ConnectX-3 (from what I saw the issue is not present on ConnectX-3 Pro,
since it has MLX4_RX_CSUM_MODE_VAL_NON_TCP_UDP bit set to 0).
regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-03 20:54 [PATCH net v2] net/mlx4_en: don't set CHECKSUM_COMPLETE on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-08-07 21:03 ` David Miller
2017-08-08 15:07 ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-08-08 16:06 ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2017-08-08 16:14 ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-08-08 16:16 ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-08-09 1:00 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502208390.2701.2.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).