netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Dawson <matthew@mjdsystems.ca>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Macieira, Thiago" <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0 don't skip empty skbs
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:31:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502724662.8411.53.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-L9CpW-DRtKfWWWKcNKcPSWvXOkTGZoKBq6=fQMrcKVWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 11:03 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > I'm actually surprised that only unix sockets can have negative values.  Is
> > there a reason for that?  I had assumed that sk_set_peek_off would allow
> > negative values as the code already has to support negative values due to what
> > the initial value is.
> 
> A negative initial value indicates that PEEK_OFF is disabled. It only
> makes sense to peek from a positive offset from the start of the data.

With the current code, the user space can disable peeking with offset
setting a negative offset value, after that peeking with offset has
been enabled. But only for UNIX sockets. I think the same should be
allowed for UDP sockets.

> > > I'm wondering adding an explicit SOCK_PEEK_OFF/MSG_PEEK_OFF socket flag
> > > would help simplyifing the code:
> 
> The behavior needs to be bifurcated between peeking with
> offset and without offset.
> 
> When peeking with offset is enabled by setting SO_PEEK_OFF,
> subsequent reads do move the offset, so the observed behavior
> is correct.
> 
> When sk->sk_peek_offset is negative, offset mode is disabled
> and the same packet must be read twice.
> 
> An explicit boolean flag to discern between the two may make
> the code simpler to understand, not sure whether that is logically
> required.

Yes, an explicit PEEK_OFF flag is just to keep the code simpler, so
that there is no need to add checks at every sk_peek_offset() call site
and the relevant logic can be fully encapsulated under the MSG_PEEK
branch in __skb_try_recv_from_queue(), I think/hope.
It's not a functional requirement.

Cheers,

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-14 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-14  5:52 [PATCH net] datagram: When peeking datagrams with offset < 0 don't skip empty skbs Matthew Dawson
2017-08-14  9:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-14 14:05   ` Matthew Dawson
2017-08-14 15:03     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 15:31       ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2017-08-15  1:35         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 15:40           ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-15 16:45             ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 17:00               ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16  9:28                 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-16 15:18                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 20:20                     ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-16 23:27                       ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 23:40                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-16 23:55                         ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-17  0:10                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-17  9:15                         ` David Laight
2017-08-17 14:37                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-17 15:47                         ` Matthew Dawson
2017-08-17 16:45                           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-15 18:17               ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-14 16:06       ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 16:33         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 17:02           ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 18:25             ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 18:33               ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 18:46                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 18:58                   ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 19:03                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-08-14 19:15                       ` Thiago Macieira
2017-08-14 19:39                         ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1502724662.8411.53.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=matthew@mjdsystems.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thiago.macieira@intel.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).