netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.13.0-rc4-next-20170811 - IP Routing / Forwarding performance vs Core/RSS number / HT on
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:57:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502729870.8411.63.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170814181957.5be27906@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 18:19 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The output (extracted below) didn't show who called 'do_raw_spin_lock',
> BUT it showed another interesting thing.  The kernel code
> __dev_queue_xmit() in might create route dst-cache problem for itself(?),
> as it will first call skb_dst_force() and then skb_dst_drop() when the
> packet is transmitted on a VLAN.
> 
>  static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, void *accel_priv)
>  {
>  [...]
> 	/* If device/qdisc don't need skb->dst, release it right now while
> 	 * its hot in this cpu cache.
> 	 */
> 	if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE)
> 		skb_dst_drop(skb);
> 	else
> 		skb_dst_force(skb);

I think that the high impact of the above code in this specific test is
mostly due to the following:

- ingress packets with different RSS rx hash lands on different CPUs
- but they use the same dst entry, since the destination IPs belong to
the same subnet
- the dst refcnt cacheline is contented between all the CPUs

Perhaps we can inprove the situation setting the IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE
flag for vlan if the underlaying device does not have (relevant)
classifier attached? (and clearing it as needed)

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-14 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-11 17:51 Kernel 4.13.0-rc4-next-20170811 - IP Routing / Forwarding performance vs Core/RSS number / HT on Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-12 12:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-12 17:27   ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-13 16:58     ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-14 16:19       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-14 16:33         ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-14 16:57         ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2017-08-15  0:45           ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15  1:07             ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-15  1:17               ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-15  9:11                 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15  9:19                   ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 10:05                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-21 21:26                   ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-21 21:34                     ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-21 21:34                       ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-21 21:41                     ` Florian Fainelli
2017-09-21 21:43                       ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-21 21:54                       ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-21 22:07                         ` Florian Fainelli
2017-09-22  0:37                           ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-18 21:49                       ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-10-18 21:54                         ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-18 22:45                           ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-09  9:03                 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-11 16:57                   ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-11 22:11                     ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15  9:35           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-15  0:38         ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15  9:23           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-15  9:30             ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15  9:57               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-15 10:02                 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 10:05                   ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 10:28                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-14  0:07     ` Alexander Duyck
2017-08-14 15:07       ` Paweł Staszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1502729870.8411.63.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).