From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, kjlx@templeofstupid.com,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC net-next 0/4] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add extack messages for RIF and VRF overflow
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:41:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507653665-20540-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> (raw)
Currently, exceeding the number of VRF instances or the number of router
interfaces either fails with a non-intuitive EBUSY:
$ ip li set swp1s1.6 vrf vrf-1s1-6 up
RTNETLINK answers: Device or resource busy
or fails silently (IPv6) since the checks are done in a work queue. This
set adds support for the address validator notifier to spectrum which
allows ext-ack based messages to be returned on failure.
To make that happen the IPv6 version needs to be converted from atomic
to blocking (patch 1), and then support for extack needs to be added
to the notifier (patch 2). Patches 3 and 4 add the validator notifier
to spectrum and then plumb the extack argument.
With this set, VRF overflows fail with:
$ ip li set swp1s1.6 vrf vrf-1s1-6 up
Error: spectrum: Exceeded number of supported VRF.
and RIF overflows fail with:
$ ip addr add dev swp1s2.191 10.12.191.1/24
Error: spectrum: Exceeded number of supported router interfaces.
David Ahern (4):
net: ipv6: Make inet6addr_validator a blocking notifier
net: Add extack to validator_info structs used for address notifier
mlxsw: spectrum: router: Add support for address validator notifier
mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add extack message for RIF and VRF overflow
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 10 ++
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.h | 4 +
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 163 +++++++++++++++------
drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c | 10 +-
include/linux/inetdevice.h | 1 +
include/net/addrconf.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/devinet.c | 8 +-
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 51 ++++---
net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c | 9 +-
9 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-10 16:41 David Ahern [this message]
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 1/4] net: ipv6: Make inet6addr_validator a blocking notifier David Ahern
2017-10-10 19:32 ` David Ahern
2017-10-11 13:08 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-11 21:13 ` David Miller
2017-10-11 21:56 ` David Ahern
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 2/4] net: Add extack to validator_info structs used for address notifier David Ahern
2017-10-11 13:37 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 3/4] mlxsw: spectrum: router: Add support for address validator notifier David Ahern
2017-10-11 13:54 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-11 15:19 ` David Ahern
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 4/4] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add extack message for RIF and VRF overflow David Ahern
2017-10-11 14:13 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-11 15:07 ` David Ahern
2017-10-11 15:10 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507653665-20540-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=kjlx@templeofstupid.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).