From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tuomas Tynkkynen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] 9p: Fixes for hard-to-hit bugs Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 04:41:08 +0300 Message-ID: <1508809268.9653.13.camel@tuxera.com> References: <20170906145908.8082-1-tuomas@tuxera.com> <1506431414.20647.0.camel@tuxera.com> <20171020201125.GU21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , Eric Van Hensbergen , Ron Minnich , Latchesar Ionkov , "David S. Miller" , , , To: Al Viro Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171020201125.GU21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Al, On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 21:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:10:14PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > > Hi Al, > > > > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 17:59 +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > > > These two patches fix two hard-to-hit (but really annoying) bugs > > > in > > > 9p. > > > The first one was posted earlier in February (with one R-b), the > > > second > > > is a new one. > > > ... > > > > > > > Could you apply these? Thanks! > > I can pick those, or, if you (or somebody else) are willing to > actively > maintain a 9p tree, you could start sending straight to Linus - up to > you. You can pick these up, I don't have plans for more patches right now (unless we hit some new bugs that affect our workloads). (FWIW there do lurk dragons there, at least 1) setxattr() with zero- length value turns into a removexattr(), and 2) creat("foo", 0444) fails due to the R/O perms when opening the writeback_fid. Fixes to either didn't seem too easy...) Thanks! - Tuomas