public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, vyasevic@redhat.com,
	kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, pombredanne@nexb.com,
	vyasevich@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, fw@strlen.de,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	roman.kapl@sysgo.com, paul@paul-moore.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
	mschiffer@universe-factory.net, rshearma@brocade.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	avagin@virtuozzo.com, gorcunov@virtuozzo.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	ktkhai@virtuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 03/25] net: Introduce net_sem for protection of pernet_list
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:27:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151094326157.20009.5480759391073404834.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151094119999.20009.6955267140148739392.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

Curently mutex is used to protect pernet operations list. It makes
cleanup_net() to execute ->exit methods of the same operations set,
which was used on the time of ->init, even after net namespace is
unlinked from net_namespace_list.

But the problem is it's need to synchronize_rcu() after net is removed
from net_namespace_list():

Destroy net_ns:
cleanup_net()
  mutex_lock(&net_mutex)
  list_del_rcu(&net->list)
  synchronize_rcu()                                  <--- Sleep there for ages
  list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
    ops_exit_list(ops, &net_exit_list)
  list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
    ops_free_list(ops, &net_exit_list)
  mutex_unlock(&net_mutex)

This primitive is not fast, especially on the systems with many processors
and/or when preemptible RCU is enabled in config. So, all the time, while
cleanup_net() is waiting for RCU grace period, creation of new net namespaces
is not possible, the tasks, who makes it, are sleeping on the same mutex:

Create net_ns:
copy_net_ns()
  mutex_lock_killable(&net_mutex)                    <--- Sleep there for ages

I observed 20-30 seconds hangs of "unshare -n" on ordinary 8-cpu laptop
with preemptible RCU enabled.

The solution is to convert net_mutex to the rw_semaphore and add small locks
to really small number of pernet_operations, what really need them. Then,
pernet_operations::init/::exit methods, modifying the net-related data,
will require down_read() locking only, while down_write() will be used
for changing pernet_list.

This gives signify performance increase, like you may see here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg467095.html

It's 4.6 times performance increase on one-thread test.
Multi-thread tests increase may be close to 4.6 multiplied
to number of threads.

This patch starts replacing net_mutex to net_sem. It adds rw_semaphore,
describes the variables it protects, and makes to use where appropriate.
net_mutex is still present, and next patches will kick it out step-by-step.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
 include/linux/rtnetlink.h |    1 +
 net/core/net_namespace.c  |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 net/core/rtnetlink.c      |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
index 2032ce2eb20b..f640fc87fe1d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern int rtnl_is_locked(void);
 
 extern wait_queue_head_t netdev_unregistering_wq;
 extern struct mutex net_mutex;
+extern struct rw_semaphore net_sem;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
 extern bool lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void);
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 2e512965bf42..2254b1639209 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ struct net init_net = {
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_net);
 
 static bool init_net_initialized;
+/*
+ * net_sem: protects: pernet_list, net_generic_ids,
+ * init_net_initialized and first_* pointers.
+ */
+DECLARE_RWSEM(net_sem);
 
 #define MIN_PERNET_OPS_ID	\
 	((sizeof(struct net_generic) + sizeof(void *) - 1) / sizeof(void *))
@@ -411,12 +416,16 @@ struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags,
 	net->ucounts = ucounts;
 	get_user_ns(user_ns);
 
-	rv = mutex_lock_killable(&net_mutex);
+	rv = down_read_killable(&net_sem);
 	if (rv < 0)
 		goto put_userns;
-
+	rv = mutex_lock_killable(&net_mutex);
+	if (rv < 0)
+		goto up_read;
 	rv = setup_net(net, user_ns);
 	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+up_read:
+	up_read(&net_sem);
 	if (rv < 0) {
 put_userns:
 		put_user_ns(user_ns);
@@ -443,6 +452,7 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
 	list_replace_init(&cleanup_list, &net_kill_list);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&cleanup_list_lock);
 
+	down_read(&net_sem);
 	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
 
 	/* Don't let anyone else find us. */
@@ -484,6 +494,7 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
 		ops_free_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_read(&net_sem);
 
 	/* Ensure there are no outstanding rcu callbacks using this
 	 * network namespace.
@@ -510,8 +521,10 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
  */
 void net_ns_barrier(void)
 {
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
 	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_ns_barrier);
 
@@ -838,12 +851,12 @@ static int __init net_ns_init(void)
 
 	rcu_assign_pointer(init_net.gen, ng);
 
-	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	if (setup_net(&init_net, &init_user_ns))
 		panic("Could not setup the initial network namespace");
 
 	init_net_initialized = true;
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 
 	register_pernet_subsys(&net_ns_ops);
 
@@ -983,9 +996,9 @@ static void unregister_pernet_operations(struct pernet_operations *ops)
 int register_pernet_subsys(struct pernet_operations *ops)
 {
 	int error;
-	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	error =  register_pernet_operations(first_device, ops);
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 	return error;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_pernet_subsys);
@@ -1001,9 +1014,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_pernet_subsys);
  */
 void unregister_pernet_subsys(struct pernet_operations *ops)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	unregister_pernet_operations(ops);
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_pernet_subsys);
 
@@ -1029,11 +1042,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_pernet_subsys);
 int register_pernet_device(struct pernet_operations *ops)
 {
 	int error;
-	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	error = register_pernet_operations(&pernet_list, ops);
 	if (!error && (first_device == &pernet_list))
 		first_device = &ops->list;
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 	return error;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_pernet_device);
@@ -1049,11 +1062,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_pernet_device);
  */
 void unregister_pernet_device(struct pernet_operations *ops)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	if (&ops->list == first_device)
 		first_device = first_device->next;
 	unregister_pernet_operations(ops);
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_pernet_device);
 
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index dabba2a91fc8..cb06d43c4230 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -390,11 +390,11 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void)
 void rtnl_link_unregister(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops)
 {
 	/* Close the race with cleanup_net() */
-	mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+	down_write(&net_sem);
 	rtnl_lock_unregistering_all();
 	__rtnl_link_unregister(ops);
 	rtnl_unlock();
-	mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
+	up_write(&net_sem);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtnl_link_unregister);
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-17 18:27 [PATCH RFC 00/25] Replacing net_mutex with rw_semaphore Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:27 ` [PATCH RFC 01/25] net: Assign net to net_namespace_list in setup_net() Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:27 ` [PATCH RFC 02/25] net: Cleanup copy_net_ns() Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:27 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2017-11-17 18:27 ` [PATCH RFC 04/25] net: Move mutex_unlock() in cleanup_net() up Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 05/25] net: Add primitives to update heads of pernet_list sublists Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 06/25] net: Add pernet sys and registration functions Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 07/25] net: Make sys sublist pernet_operations executed out of net_mutex Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 08/25] net: Move proc_net_ns_ops to pernet_sys list Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 09/25] net: Move net_ns_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:28 ` [PATCH RFC 10/25] net: Move sysctl_pernet_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 11/25] net: Move netfilter_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 12/25] net: Move nf_log_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 13/25] net: Move net_inuse_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 14/25] net: Move net_defaults_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 15/25] net: Move netlink_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 16/25] net: Move rtnetlink_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:29 ` [PATCH RFC 17/25] net: Move audit_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH RFC 18/25] net: Move uevent_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH RFC 19/25] net: Move proto_net_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH RFC 20/25] net: Move pernet_subsys, registered via net_dev_init(), " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH RFC 21/25] net: Move fib_* pernet_operations, registered via subsys_initcall(), " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH RFC 22/25] net: Move subsys_initcall() registered pernet_operations from net/sched " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH RFC 23/25] net: Move genl_pernet_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:31 ` [PATCH RFC 24/25] net: Move wext_pernet_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-17 18:31 ` [PATCH RFC 25/25] net: Move sysctl_core_ops " Kirill Tkhai
2017-11-19  1:52 ` [PATCH RFC 00/25] Replacing net_mutex with rw_semaphore Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151094326157.20009.5480759391073404834.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=gorcunov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mschiffer@universe-factory.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=roman.kapl@sysgo.com \
    --cc=rshearma@brocade.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox