From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: Neaten logging macros and add KERN_DEBUG logging level Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:46:04 -0800 Message-ID: <1512071164.19952.129.camel@perches.com> References: <1512065211.19952.112.camel@perches.com> <20171130.123117.1742804316627893121.davem@davemloft.net> <25765.1512070491@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs To: David Howells Return-path: In-Reply-To: <25765.1512070491@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 19:34 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Joe Perches wrote: > > > There is no listed rxrpc maintainer. > > There's a script in the kernel called get_maintainer.pl which you might find > of use: Yeah, I've heard of it. I also wrote it btw. > warthog>./scripts/get_maintainer.pl net/rxrpc/ > "David S. Miller" (maintainer:NETWORKING [GENERAL],commit_signer:23/74=31%) > David Howells (commit_signer:64/74=86%,authored:60/74=81%) > netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) The script I use to send patches does not cc patch authors as, based on my history sending patches, most to many of them do not want to see patches. > It would seem a good idea to cc me, as the one with the largest "authored" > also. Perhaps a better idea would be to have an rxrpc section in the MAINTAINERS file. cheers, Joe