From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
tom@herbertland.com, aconole@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3] tun: add eBPF based queue selection method
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 14:11:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1512684709.25033.18.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512379883-11887-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 17:31 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch introduces an eBPF based queue selection method. With
> this,
> the policy could be offloaded to userspace completely through a new
> ioctl TUNSETSTEERINGEBPF.
Sorry for the delay, I see this patch was merged already.
...
> static void tun_free_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev);
> @@ -1996,6 +2068,9 @@ static void tun_free_netdev(struct net_device
> *dev)
> free_percpu(tun->pcpu_stats);
> tun_flow_uninit(tun);
> security_tun_dev_free_security(tun->security);
> + rtnl_lock();
> + __tun_set_steering_ebpf(tun, NULL);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> }
I am pretty sure tun_free_netdev() (aka ->priv_destructor()) can be
called under RTNL (say from register_netdevice())
So this will dead lock badly ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-07 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 9:31 [PATCH net-next V3] tun: add eBPF based queue selection method Jason Wang
2017-12-05 0:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-05 7:29 ` Jason Wang
2017-12-05 16:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-05 17:02 ` David Miller
2017-12-06 2:30 ` Jason Wang
2017-12-07 22:11 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2017-12-08 2:25 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1512684709.25033.18.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).