Re: [pull request][for-next V3 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19

[Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1581 bytes --]

On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 19:46 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:23:03 +0200
> 
> > ==============
> > This series includes updates for mlx5 E-Switch infrastructures,
> > to be merged into net-next and rdma-next trees.
> > 
> > Mark's patches provide E-Switch refactoring that generalize the mlx5
> > E-Switch vf representors interfaces and data structures. The serious is
> > mainly focused on moving ethernet (netdev) specific representors logic out
> > of E-Switch (eswitch.c) into mlx5e representor module (en_rep.c), which
> > provides better separation and allows future support for other types of vf
> > representors (e.g. RDMA).
> > 
> > Gal's patches at the end of this serious, provide a simple syntax fix and
> > two other patches that handles vport ingress/egress ACL steering name
> > spaces to be aligned with the Firmware/Hardware specs.
> > ===============
> > 
> > V1->V2:
> >  - Addressed coding style comments in patches #1 and #7
> >  - The series is still based on rc4, as now I see net-next is also @rc4.
> > 
> > V2->V3:
> >  - Fixed compilation warning, reported by Dave.
> > 
> > Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.
> 
> Looks good, pulled, thank you.

Hi Jason,

Unless I missed something, you haven't pulled this for for-next,
correct?

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]