From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/11] bpf: Add write access to tcp_sock and sock fields Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:21:48 -0800 Message-ID: <1515540108.131759.13.camel@gmail.com> References: <20180109210704.893375-1-brakmo@fb.com> <20180109210704.893375-4-brakmo@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kernel Team , Blake Matheny , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Neal Cardwell , Yuchung Cheng To: Lawrence Brakmo , netdev Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:46065 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752903AbeAIXVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 18:21:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id c194so8163288pga.12 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:21:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20180109210704.893375-4-brakmo@fb.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 13:06 -0800, Lawrence Brakmo wrote: > This patch adds a macro, SOCK_OPS_SET_FIELD, for writing to > struct tcp_sock or struct sock fields. This required adding a new > field "temp" to struct bpf_sock_ops_kern for temporary storage that > is used by sock_ops_convert_ctx_access. It is used to store and recover > the contents of a register, so the register can be used to store the > address of the sk. Since we cannot overwrite the dst_reg because it > contains the pointer to ctx, nor the src_reg since it contains the value > we want to store, we need an extra register to contain the address > of the sk. > > Also adds the macro SOCK_OPS_GET_OR_SET_FIELD that calls one of the > GET or SET macros depending on the value of the TYPE field. > > Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo > --- > include/linux/filter.h | 3 +++ > include/net/tcp.h | 2 +- > net/core/filter.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h > index 425056c..139a9a3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/filter.h > +++ b/include/linux/filter.h > @@ -1007,6 +1007,9 @@ struct bpf_sock_ops_kern { > u32 replylong[4]; > }; > u32 is_fullsock; > + u64 temp; /* Used by sock_ops_convert_ctx_access > + * as temporary storaage of a register typo on storage > + */ > }; > > #endif /* __LINUX_FILTER_H__ */ > diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h > index 6939e69..108d16a 100644 > --- a/include/net/tcp.h > +++ b/include/net/tcp.h > @@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@ static inline int tcp_call_bpf(struct sock *sk, int op) > struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops; > int ret; > > - memset(&sock_ops, 0, sizeof(sock_ops)); > + memset(&sock_ops, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, temp)); > This lacks proper comment, stating that every field added after .temp in struct bpf_sock_ops_kern is considered as scratch and could contain garbage.