From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>, Blake Matheny <bmatheny@fb.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/11] bpf: Adds field bpf_sock_ops_flags to tcp_sock
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:30:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515540628.131759.15.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180109210704.893375-6-brakmo@fb.com>
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 13:06 -0800, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> Adds field bpf_sock_ops_flags to tcp_sock and bpf_sock_ops. Its primary
> use is to determine if there should be calls to sock_ops bpf program at
> various points in the TCP code. The field is initialized to zero,
> disabling the calls. A sock_ops BPF program can set, per connection and
> as necessary, when the connection is established.
>
> It also adds support for reading and writting the field within a
> sock_ops BPF program.
>
> Examples of where to call the bpf program:
>
> 1) When RTO fires
> 2) When a packet is retransmitted
> 3) When the connection terminates
> 4) When a packet is sent
> 5) When a packet is received
>
> Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>
> ---
> include/linux/tcp.h | 8 ++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> net/core/filter.c | 7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> index 4f93f095..62f4388 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
> @@ -373,6 +373,14 @@ struct tcp_sock {
> */
> struct request_sock *fastopen_rsk;
> u32 *saved_syn;
> +
> +/* Sock_ops bpf program related variables */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF
> + u32 bpf_sock_ops_flags; /* values defined in uapi/linux/tcp.h */
> +#define BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(TP, ARG) (TP->bpf_sock_ops_flags & ARG)
> +#else
> +#define BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG(TP, ARG) 0
> +#endif
> };
>
It looks like we add yet another TCP socket field for some feature that
is only used by you or FB :/
At least please try to fill a hole (on 64bit kernels), instead of
adding one more.
Also, should not we reject attempts to use bits that are not yet
supported by the kernel ?
If a BPF filter expects to be called for every retransmit, but kernel
is too old, this wont work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 21:06 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/11] bpf: More sock_ops callbacks Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/11] bpf: Make SOCK_OPS_GET_TCP size independent Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/11] bpf: Make SOCK_OPS_GET_TCP struct independent Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/11] bpf: Add write access to tcp_sock and sock fields Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 23:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-09 23:41 ` Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/11] bpf: Support passing args to sock_ops bpf function Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/11] bpf: Adds field bpf_sock_ops_flags to tcp_sock Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 23:30 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-01-10 0:31 ` Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/11] bpf: Add sock_ops RTO callback Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/11] bpf: Add support for reading sk_state and more Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/11] bpf: Add sock_ops R/W access to tclass & sk_txhash Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/11] bpf: Add BPF_SOCK_OPS_RETRANS_CB Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/11] bpf: Add BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB Lawrence Brakmo
2018-01-09 21:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/11] bpf: add selftest for tcpbpf Lawrence Brakmo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515540628.131759.15.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bmatheny@fb.com \
--cc=brakmo@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).