From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: [bpf-next PATCH] bpf: simplify xdp_convert_ctx_access for xdp_rxq_info
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:39:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151568874925.5413.12343433820668284586.stgit@firesoul> (raw)
As pointed out by Daniel Borkmann, using bpf_target_off() is not
necessary for xdp_rxq_info when extracting queue_index and
ifindex, as these members are u32 like BPF_W.
Also fix trivial spelling mistake introduced in same commit.
Fixes: 02dd3291b2f0 ("bpf: finally expose xdp_rxq_info to XDP bpf-programs")
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
net/core/filter.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 405317f9c064..395d261948de 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ struct xdp_md {
__u32 data;
__u32 data_end;
__u32 data_meta;
- /* Below access go though struct xdp_rxq_info */
+ /* Below access go through struct xdp_rxq_info */
__u32 ingress_ifindex; /* rxq->dev->ifindex */
__u32 rx_queue_index; /* rxq->queue_index */
};
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index acdb94c0e97f..4ce50306154d 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4312,16 +4312,15 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
offsetof(struct xdp_rxq_info, dev));
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
- bpf_target_off(struct net_device,
- ifindex, 4, target_size));
+ offsetof(struct net_device, ifindex));
break;
case offsetof(struct xdp_md, rx_queue_index):
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct xdp_buff, rxq),
si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
offsetof(struct xdp_buff, rxq));
*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
- bpf_target_off(struct xdp_rxq_info,
- queue_index, 4, target_size));
+ offsetof(struct xdp_rxq_info,
+ queue_index));
break;
}
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-11 16:39 Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2018-01-12 23:13 ` [bpf-next PATCH] bpf: simplify xdp_convert_ctx_access for xdp_rxq_info Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151568874925.5413.12343433820668284586.stgit@firesoul \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox