[PATCH v2] bpf: fix divides by zero

[Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>]

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Divides by zero are not nice, lets avoid them if possible.

Also do_div() seems not needed when dealing with 32bit operands,
but this seems a minor detail.

Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
---
v2: kernel patches 101 : do not mangle patch :/

 kernel/bpf/core.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 51ec2dda7f08c6c90af084589bb6d80662c77d12..7949e8b8f94e9cc196e0449214493ccce61b0903 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		DST = tmp;
 		CONT;
 	ALU_MOD_X:
-		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
+		if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))
 			return 0;
 		tmp = (u32) DST;
 		DST = do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
 		CONT;
 	ALU_DIV_X:
-		if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
+		if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))
 			return 0;
 		tmp = (u32) DST;
 		do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);