From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:47:50 +0000 Message-ID: <1516200470.4184.26.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20180105042811.1590965-1-ast@fb.com> <20180108170553.yrs46fawfpr62wtr@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , "David S . Miller" , Daniel Borkmann , Jann Horn , Dan Williams , Peter Zijlstra , Elena Reshetova , Network Development , kernel-team , Will Deacon To: Linus Torvalds , Mark Rutland Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:57595 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753168AbeAQOsT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:48:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > (c) isn't actually done in any real CPU's today that I'm aware of > (unless you want to call the return stack data speculation). There are processors out there today that data speculate. For Intel family 6 Core, Knights and Atom today all is good. Alan