From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/6] sock: MSG_PEEK support for sk_error_queue
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:54:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516290887.3606.21.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118110207.GA24920@oracle.com>
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 06:02 -0500, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (01/17/18 18:50), Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >
> > This can cause reordering with parallel readers. Can we avoid the need
> > for peeking? It also caused a slew of subtle bugs previously.
>
> Yes, I did notice the potential for re-ordering when writing the patch..
> but these are not actuallly messages from the wire, so is re-ordering
> fatal?
Some applications out there would break horribly, trust me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 12:19 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/6] rds: zerocopy support Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 12:19 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/6] sock: MSG_PEEK support for sk_error_queue Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 23:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 11:02 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-01-18 16:10 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 16:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-18 17:12 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 22:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 23:03 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 23:09 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 23:20 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 23:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 15:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/6] skbuff: export mm_[un]account_pinned_pages for other modules Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/6] rds: hold a sock ref from rds_message to the rds_sock Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/6] sock: permit SO_ZEROCOPY on PF_RDS socket Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 0:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/6] rds: support for zcopy completion notification Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 0:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-18 11:40 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 22:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-01-17 12:20 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 6/6] rds: zerocopy Tx support Sowmini Varadhan
2018-01-18 0:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516290887.3606.21.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).