From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>,
Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] kcm: do not attach sockets if sk_user_data is already used
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:46:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516304793.3606.26.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34yLtP4QbOdOnNho4uFauk=dMDjQvDpeAHm0AakiyYeoA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 11:26 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 09:46 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > >
> > > Then that's increasing the udp_sock structure size for a narrow use
> > > case which will get push back. I think it's going to be better to
> > > stick with one sock pointer. We could maybe redefine sk_user_data as a
> > > pointer to an allocated structure or array so it can hold multiple
> > > user_data pointers (in lieu of chaining).
> > >
> >
> > We do not have a lot of UDP sockets per host, I do not believe it
> > should be a problem adding stuff in them.
> >
>
> Eric,
>
> Is QUIC using unconnected sockets then?
Server side is using a bunch of unconnected sockets, usually one per
cpu.
Note that UDP stack has no 4-tuple proper support yet, and even if it
had, extra memory costs would be huge on servers handling millions of
flows.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-14 11:32 [PATCH net-next] kcm: do not attach sockets if sk_user_data is already used James Chapman
2018-01-16 10:44 ` Guillaume Nault
2018-01-16 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-16 17:36 ` Tom Herbert
2018-01-16 19:00 ` David Miller
2018-01-17 11:13 ` James Chapman
2018-01-17 19:25 ` David Miller
2018-01-18 15:18 ` Guillaume Nault
2018-01-18 15:40 ` James Chapman
2018-01-18 16:29 ` Guillaume Nault
2018-01-18 17:30 ` James Chapman
2018-01-18 17:46 ` Tom Herbert
2018-01-18 18:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-18 19:26 ` Tom Herbert
2018-01-18 19:46 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-01-18 17:40 ` Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516304793.3606.26.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).