netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix incorrect kmalloc usage in lpm_trie MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY rcu region
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 07:50:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516722649.3478.15.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180123065351.2690530-1-yhs@fb.com>

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 22:53 -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> In commit b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map"),
> the implemented MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY callback function is guarded with rcu read lock.
> In the function body, "kmalloc(size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN)" is used which may
> sleep and violate rcu read lock region requirements. This patch fixed the issue
> by using GFP_ATOMIC instead to avoid blocking kmalloc. Tested with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y as suggested by Eric Dumazet.
> 
> Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>


Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Thanks.

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> index d7ea962..8f083ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
>  	}
>  
>  	node_stack = kmalloc(trie->max_prefixlen * sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node *),
> -			     GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +			     GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
>  	if (!node_stack)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-23  6:53 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix incorrect kmalloc usage in lpm_trie MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY rcu region Yonghong Song
2018-01-23 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-01-23 16:35   ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1516722649.3478.15.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).