From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix incorrect kmalloc usage in lpm_trie MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY rcu region
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 07:50:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516722649.3478.15.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180123065351.2690530-1-yhs@fb.com>
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 22:53 -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> In commit b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map"),
> the implemented MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY callback function is guarded with rcu read lock.
> In the function body, "kmalloc(size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN)" is used which may
> sleep and violate rcu read lock region requirements. This patch fixed the issue
> by using GFP_ATOMIC instead to avoid blocking kmalloc. Tested with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y as suggested by Eric Dumazet.
>
> Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Thanks.
> ---
> kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> index d7ea962..8f083ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
> }
>
> node_stack = kmalloc(trie->max_prefixlen * sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node *),
> - GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> if (!node_stack)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-23 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-23 6:53 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix incorrect kmalloc usage in lpm_trie MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY rcu region Yonghong Song
2018-01-23 15:50 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-01-23 16:35 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516722649.3478.15.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).