From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 00/12] bpf: More sock_ops callbacks Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:48:00 -0800 Message-ID: <1516808880.3715.20.camel@gmail.com> References: <20180124075802.1522053-1-brakmo@fb.com> <1516803255.3715.16.camel@gmail.com> <7c73497a-19c3-bfa9-3a66-a1187d429c6d@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kernel Team , Blake Matheny , Daniel Borkmann , Neal Cardwell , Yuchung Cheng To: Alexei Starovoitov , Lawrence Brakmo , netdev Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:39871 "EHLO mail-pf0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934132AbeAXPsE (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:48:04 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id e11so3360214pff.6 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:48:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7c73497a-19c3-bfa9-3a66-a1187d429c6d@fb.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 07:27 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > Most of the time, Yes, but it's the other way around this time. > I specifically asked Larry to do it this way, since net tree is > practically closed (only critical fixes allowed). > When 4.15 is released on Sunday we'll send this patch > independently to 4.15 and 4.14 > How hard would it be to put the fix first in the series then ? If this proves complex, then maybe we have a bigger problem. I did not know merging bpf into bpf-next would be hard :) Thanks.