From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] hv_netvsc: Split netvsc_revoke_buf() and
 netvsc_teardown_gpadl()
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:16:49 +0100
Message-ID: <1517397409.3452.7.camel@redhat.com>
References: <1516700045-32142-1-git-send-email-mgamal@redhat.com>
         <1516700045-32142-2-git-send-email-mgamal@redhat.com>
         <20180130112926.53f3c166@xeon-e3>
Reply-To: mgamal@redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, otubo@redhat.com, sthemmin@microsoft.com,
        haiyangz@microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@linuxdriverproject.org, vkuznets@redhat.com
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57906 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751756AbeAaLQy (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:16:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180130112926.53f3c166@xeon-e3>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:29 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:34:04 +0100
> Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Split each of the functions into two for each of send/recv buffers
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@redhat.com>
> 
> Splitting these functions is not necessary

How so? We need to send each message independently, and hence the split
(see cover letter). Is there another way?