From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Compare length of req sock queue with sk_max_ack_backlog
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:00:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517493607.3715.117.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMDZJNWq-48Hkmz1wDy+hVjRGrkkFJqXBEgzoezPmhE8pXAXbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 20:34 +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> Hi Eric
> One question for you, In the patch ef547f2ac16 ("tcp: remove
> max_qlen_log"), why we compared the length of req sock queue with
> sk_max_ack_backlog. If we remove the max_qlen_log, we should check the
> length of req sock queue with tcp_max_syn_backlog, right ?
>
> With this patch, the option "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog"
> will be unsed anymore, right ?
Not right.
Please "git grep -n sysctl_max_syn_backlog" to convince it is still
used.
>
> I hope we should
> 1. Add a variate in sock struct, such as sk_max_syn_backlog. Then req
> sock queue and accept sock queue can control their max value. When we
> create the sock, we can store the tcp_max_syn_backlog value to
> sk_max_syn_backlog.
>
There is a single /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog value shared
by all sockets of a given network namespace.
But you can have thousands of TCP listeners, each of them having a
distinct listen() backlog
> 2. Update the backlog, we can update it via ioctl.
No need to add an ugly ioctl.
Simply call listen() again with another backlog value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 12:34 Compare length of req sock queue with sk_max_ack_backlog Tonghao Zhang
2018-02-01 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-02-02 1:55 ` Tonghao Zhang
2018-02-02 4:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-02 5:41 ` Tonghao Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517493607.3715.117.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).