From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()"
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 09:59:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517594367.3715.130.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180202165754.8551-1-guro@fb.com>
On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 16:57 +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This patch effectively reverts commit 9f1c2674b328 ("net: memcontrol:
> defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()").
>
> Moving mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() to the inet_csk_accept() completely breaks
> memcg socket memory accounting, as packets received before memcg
> pointer initialization are not accounted and are causing refcounting
> underflow on socket release.
>
> Actually the free-after-use problem was fixed by
> commit c0576e397508 ("net: call cgroup_sk_alloc() earlier in
> sk_clone_lock()") for the cgroup pointer.
>
> So, let's revert it and call mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() just before
> cgroup_sk_alloc(). This is safe, as we hold a reference to the socket
> we're cloning, and it holds a reference to the memcg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> net/core/sock.c | 5 +----
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 0ae2dc3a1748..0937f2c52c7d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5747,6 +5747,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk)
> if (!mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_memcg already
> + * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from
> + * process context. So the test for root memcg given
> + * the current task's memcg won't help us in this case.
> + *
> + * Respecting the original socket's memcg is a better
> + * decision in this case.
> + */
> + if (sk->sk_memcg) {
Original commit had a BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root(sk->sk_memcg));
I presume it is no longer useful ?
Thanks
> + css_get(&sk->sk_memcg->css);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-02 16:57 [PATCH net] Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()" Roman Gushchin
2018-02-02 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-02-02 18:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-02-02 18:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-02 19:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-02-02 19:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-02 19:54 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517594367.3715.130.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).