From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "defer call to mem_cgroup_sk_alloc()"
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 10:39:04 -0800
Message-ID: <1517596744.3715.137.camel@gmail.com>
References: <20180202165754.8551-1-guro@fb.com>
         <1517594367.3715.130.camel@gmail.com>
         <20180202180624.GA11596@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pl0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52]:43921 "EHLO
        mail-pl0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752210AbeBBSjI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:39:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20180202180624.GA11596@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 18:06 +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> 
> Idk, how even we can hit it? And if so, what scary will happen?
> 
> If you prefer to have it there, I definitely can return it,
> but I see no profit so far.

I was simply curious this was not mentioned in the changelog.

A revert is normally a true revert, modulo the changes needed by
conflicts and possible changes.

I personally do not care of this BUG_ON(), I had not put it in the
first place.

Thanks.