From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
To: Mike Maloney <maloney@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org,
Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Subject: Re: Regression for ip6-in-ip4 IPsec tunnel in 4.14.16
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:05:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518023139.2100.7.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518021487.2100.2.camel@debian.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 772 bytes --]
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 17:38 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Starting with 4.14.16, IPv6 traffic is broken. When trying a simple ping
> to an IPv6 address I get:
>
> ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument
I forgot an important bit of information: due to the way routers usually broke
path MTU discovery by filtering ICMP, I'm lowering the MTU to 1280 (so exactly
IPV6_MIN_MTU) when using IPsec.
The MTU is configured by the IKE daemon (strongSwan, thus adding Tobias to
CC:) in routing table 220:
default via 192.168.28.254 dev eth0 proto static src 192.168.0.129 mtu 1280 advmss 1320
I'll try to printk the mtu before returning EINVAL to see why it's lower than
1280, but maybe the IP encapsulation is not correctly handled?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 16:38 Regression for ip6-in-ip4 IPsec tunnel in 4.14.16 Yves-Alexis Perez
2018-02-07 17:05 ` Yves-Alexis Perez [this message]
2018-02-07 17:23 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2018-02-07 18:50 ` Mike Maloney
2018-02-07 19:46 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2018-02-08 12:40 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518023139.2100.7.camel@debian.org \
--to=corsac@debian.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maloney@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tobias@strongswan.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).