From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
vyasevic@redhat.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vyasevich@gmail.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
leonro@mellanox.com, avagin@virtuozzo.com, fw@strlen.de,
roman.kapl@sysgo.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] net: Kill net_mutex
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:58:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <151903431795.8021.5069678488269142143.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151903409491.8021.11032992295248447417.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
We take net_mutex, when there are !async pernet_operations
registered, and read locking of net_sem is not enough. But
we may get rid of taking the mutex, and just change the logic
to write lock net_sem in such cases. This obviously reduces
the number of lock operations, we do.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
include/linux/rtnetlink.h | 1 -
include/net/net_namespace.h | 11 ++++++---
net/core/net_namespace.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
index e9ee9ad0a681..3573b4bf2fdf 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ extern int rtnl_trylock(void);
extern int rtnl_is_locked(void);
extern wait_queue_head_t netdev_unregistering_wq;
-extern struct mutex net_mutex;
extern struct rw_semaphore net_sem;
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
index 9158ec1ad06f..115b01b92f4d 100644
--- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
+++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
@@ -60,8 +60,11 @@ struct net {
struct list_head list; /* list of network namespaces */
struct list_head cleanup_list; /* namespaces on death row */
- struct list_head exit_list; /* Use only net_mutex */
-
+ struct list_head exit_list; /* To linked to call pernet exit
+ * methods on dead net (net_sem
+ * read locked), or to unregister
+ * pernet ops (net_sem wr locked).
+ */
struct user_namespace *user_ns; /* Owning user namespace */
struct ucounts *ucounts;
spinlock_t nsid_lock;
@@ -89,7 +92,7 @@ struct net {
/* core fib_rules */
struct list_head rules_ops;
- struct list_head fib_notifier_ops; /* protected by net_mutex */
+ struct list_head fib_notifier_ops; /* protected by net_sem */
struct net_device *loopback_dev; /* The loopback */
struct netns_core core;
@@ -316,7 +319,7 @@ struct pernet_operations {
/*
* Indicates above methods are allowed to be executed in parallel
* with methods of any other pernet_operations, i.e. they are not
- * need synchronization via net_mutex.
+ * need write locked net_sem.
*/
bool async;
};
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index bcab9a938d6f..e89a516620dd 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
static LIST_HEAD(pernet_list);
static struct list_head *first_device = &pernet_list;
-/* Used only if there are !async pernet_operations registered */
-DEFINE_MUTEX(net_mutex);
LIST_HEAD(net_namespace_list);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(net_namespace_list);
@@ -407,6 +405,7 @@ struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags,
{
struct ucounts *ucounts;
struct net *net;
+ unsigned write;
int rv;
if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWNET))
@@ -424,20 +423,26 @@ struct net *copy_net_ns(unsigned long flags,
refcount_set(&net->passive, 1);
net->ucounts = ucounts;
get_user_ns(user_ns);
-
- rv = down_read_killable(&net_sem);
+again:
+ write = READ_ONCE(nr_sync_pernet_ops);
+ if (write)
+ rv = down_write_killable(&net_sem);
+ else
+ rv = down_read_killable(&net_sem);
if (rv < 0)
goto put_userns;
- if (nr_sync_pernet_ops) {
- rv = mutex_lock_killable(&net_mutex);
- if (rv < 0)
- goto up_read;
+
+ if (!write && unlikely(READ_ONCE(nr_sync_pernet_ops))) {
+ up_read(&net_sem);
+ goto again;
}
rv = setup_net(net, user_ns);
- if (nr_sync_pernet_ops)
- mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
-up_read:
- up_read(&net_sem);
+
+ if (write)
+ up_write(&net_sem);
+ else
+ up_read(&net_sem);
+
if (rv < 0) {
put_userns:
put_user_ns(user_ns);
@@ -485,15 +490,23 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
struct net *net, *tmp, *last;
struct list_head net_kill_list;
LIST_HEAD(net_exit_list);
+ unsigned write;
/* Atomically snapshot the list of namespaces to cleanup */
spin_lock_irq(&cleanup_list_lock);
list_replace_init(&cleanup_list, &net_kill_list);
spin_unlock_irq(&cleanup_list_lock);
+again:
+ write = READ_ONCE(nr_sync_pernet_ops);
+ if (write)
+ down_write(&net_sem);
+ else
+ down_read(&net_sem);
- down_read(&net_sem);
- if (nr_sync_pernet_ops)
- mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+ if (!write && unlikely(READ_ONCE(nr_sync_pernet_ops))) {
+ up_read(&net_sem);
+ goto again;
+ }
/* Don't let anyone else find us. */
rtnl_lock();
@@ -528,14 +541,14 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
ops_exit_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
- if (nr_sync_pernet_ops)
- mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
-
/* Free the net generic variables */
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
ops_free_list(ops, &net_exit_list);
- up_read(&net_sem);
+ if (write)
+ up_write(&net_sem);
+ else
+ up_read(&net_sem);
/* Ensure there are no outstanding rcu callbacks using this
* network namespace.
@@ -563,8 +576,6 @@ static void cleanup_net(struct work_struct *work)
void net_ns_barrier(void)
{
down_write(&net_sem);
- mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
- mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
up_write(&net_sem);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(net_ns_barrier);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 9:58 [PATCH 0/3] net: Get rid of net_mutex and simplify cleanup_list queueing Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-19 9:58 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2018-02-20 23:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: Kill net_mutex Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-21 10:16 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-19 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: Make cleanup_list and net::cleanup_list of llist type Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-20 19:42 ` Cong Wang
2018-02-21 8:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-19 9:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: Queue net_cleanup_work only if there is first net added Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-19 13:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: Get rid of net_mutex and simplify cleanup_list queueing Kirill Tkhai
2018-02-20 18:24 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=151903431795.8021.5069678488269142143.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=roman.kapl@sysgo.com \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox