From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:40:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519270814.55655.48.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214031719.vbq6yvgtv76sgnvg@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 19:17 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:00:21PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > There is a memory leak happening in lpm_trie map_free callback
> > function trie_free. The trie structure itself does not get freed.
> >
> > Also, trie_free function did not do synchronize_rcu before freeing
> > various data structures. This is incorrect as some rcu_read_lock
> > region(s) for lookup, update, delete or get_next_key may not complete yet.
> > The fix is to add synchronize_rcu in the beginning of trie_free.
> > The useless spin_lock is removed from this function as well.
> >
> > Fixes: b95a5c4db09b ("bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation")
> > Reported-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
> > Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Tested-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 11 +++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > Make comments more precise and make label name more appropriate,
> > as suggested by Daniel
>
> Applied to bpf tree, Thanks Yonghong.
This does not look good.
LOCKDEP surely should complain to
node = rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock));
Since we no longer hold trie->lock
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-14 3:00 [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function Yonghong Song
2018-02-14 3:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-02-22 3:40 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-02-22 3:55 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519270814.55655.48.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox