From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [2/2] net/usb/ax88179_178a: Delete three unnecessary variables in ax88179_chk_eee() Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:26:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1520936817.5879.2.camel@suse.com> References: <019cc24b-d9c0-d782-35e8-f9f8be0534db@users.sourceforge.net> <1520849038.29340.3.camel@suse.com> <7d45bd0c-5ab2-a2c0-d746-ef2d859eea08@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Philippe Reynes , Andrew Lunn , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork , Yuval Shaia , "Andrew F. Davis" , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML To: SF Markus Elfring , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7d45bd0c-5ab2-a2c0-d746-ef2d859eea08@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 13.03.2018, 08:24 +0100 schrieb SF Markus Elfring: > > > > > > > > Use three values directly for a condition check without assigning them > > > to intermediate variables. > > > > Hi, > > > > what is the benefit of this? > > I proposed a small source code reduction. > > Other software design directions might become more interesting for this use case. Yes and doing so you killed three meaningful names that tell us what these checks actually test for. That is not an improvement. Regards Oliver