From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: sulrich@codeaurora.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
timur@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 4/7] igb: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 15:06:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522695990-31082-5-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522695990-31082-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
memory-barriers.txt has been updated as follows:
"When using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the
cache coherent memory writes have completed before writing to the MMIO
region."
Remove old IA-64 comments in the code along with unneeded wmb() in front
of writel().
There are places in the code where wmb() has been used as a double barrier
for CPU and IO in place of smp_wmb() and wmb() as an optimization. For
such places, keep the wmb() but replace the following writel() with
writel_relaxed() to have a sequence as
wmb()
writel_relaxed()
mmio_wb()
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index c1c0bc3..c3f7130 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -5652,11 +5652,7 @@ static int igb_tx_map(struct igb_ring *tx_ring,
/* set the timestamp */
first->time_stamp = jiffies;
- /* Force memory writes to complete before letting h/w know there
- * are new descriptors to fetch. (Only applicable for weak-ordered
- * memory model archs, such as IA-64).
- *
- * We also need this memory barrier to make certain all of the
+ /* We need this memory barrier to make certain all of the
* status bits have been updated before next_to_watch is written.
*/
wmb();
@@ -5674,7 +5670,7 @@ static int igb_tx_map(struct igb_ring *tx_ring,
igb_maybe_stop_tx(tx_ring, DESC_NEEDED);
if (netif_xmit_stopped(txring_txq(tx_ring)) || !skb->xmit_more) {
- writel(i, tx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, tx_ring->tail);
/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
* at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
@@ -8073,12 +8069,6 @@ void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)
/* update next to alloc since we have filled the ring */
rx_ring->next_to_alloc = i;
- /* Force memory writes to complete before letting h/w
- * know there are new descriptors to fetch. (Only
- * applicable for weak-ordered memory model archs,
- * such as IA-64).
- */
- wmb();
writel(i, rx_ring->tail);
}
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 19:06 [PATCH v8 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] i40e/i40evf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] ixgbe: eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] igbvf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] fm10k: Eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb() Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 2:59 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 17:47 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-04-03 17:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 18:26 ` Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522695990-31082-5-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sulrich@codeaurora.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).