From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <mohan.krishna.ghanta.krishnamurthy@ericsson.com>,
<tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>, <hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au>,
<jon.maloy@ericsson.com>, <canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au>,
<ying.xue@windriver.com>, <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [net 1/1] tipc: fix use-after-free in tipc_nametbl_stop
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:25:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523993142-7202-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com> (raw)
When we delete a service item in tipc_nametbl_stop() we loop over
all service ranges in the service's RB tree, and for each service
range we loop over its pertaining publications while calling
tipc_service_remove_publ() for each of them.
However, tipc_service_remove_publ() has the side effect that it also
removes the comprising service range item when there are no publications
left. This leads to a "use-after-free" access when the inner loop
continues to the next iteration, since the range item holding the list
we are looping no longer exists.
We fix this by moving the delete of the service range item outside
the said function. Instead, we now let the two functions calling it
test if the list is empty and perform the removal when that is the
case.
Reported-by: syzbot+d64b64afc55660106556@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
---
net/tipc/name_table.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/name_table.c b/net/tipc/name_table.c
index 4068eaa..dd1c4fa 100644
--- a/net/tipc/name_table.c
+++ b/net/tipc/name_table.c
@@ -241,7 +241,8 @@ static struct publication *tipc_service_insert_publ(struct net *net,
static struct publication *tipc_service_remove_publ(struct net *net,
struct tipc_service *sc,
u32 lower, u32 upper,
- u32 node, u32 key)
+ u32 node, u32 key,
+ struct service_range **rng)
{
struct tipc_subscription *sub, *tmp;
struct service_range *sr;
@@ -275,19 +276,15 @@ static struct publication *tipc_service_remove_publ(struct net *net,
list_del(&p->all_publ);
list_del(&p->local_publ);
-
- /* Remove service range item if this was its last publication */
- if (list_empty(&sr->all_publ)) {
+ if (list_empty(&sr->all_publ))
last = true;
- rb_erase(&sr->tree_node, &sc->ranges);
- kfree(sr);
- }
/* Notify any waiting subscriptions */
list_for_each_entry_safe(sub, tmp, &sc->subscriptions, service_list) {
tipc_sub_report_overlap(sub, p->lower, p->upper, TIPC_WITHDRAWN,
p->port, p->node, p->scope, last);
}
+ *rng = sr;
return p;
}
@@ -379,13 +376,20 @@ struct publication *tipc_nametbl_remove_publ(struct net *net, u32 type,
u32 node, u32 key)
{
struct tipc_service *sc = tipc_service_find(net, type);
+ struct service_range *sr = NULL;
struct publication *p = NULL;
if (!sc)
return NULL;
spin_lock_bh(&sc->lock);
- p = tipc_service_remove_publ(net, sc, lower, upper, node, key);
+ p = tipc_service_remove_publ(net, sc, lower, upper, node, key, &sr);
+
+ /* Remove service range item if this was its last publication */
+ if (sr && list_empty(&sr->all_publ)) {
+ rb_erase(&sr->tree_node, &sc->ranges);
+ kfree(sr);
+ }
/* Delete service item if this no more publications and subscriptions */
if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sc->ranges) && list_empty(&sc->subscriptions)) {
@@ -747,16 +751,17 @@ int tipc_nametbl_init(struct net *net)
static void tipc_service_delete(struct net *net, struct tipc_service *sc)
{
struct service_range *sr, *tmpr;
- struct publication *p, *tmpb;
+ struct publication *p, *tmp;
spin_lock_bh(&sc->lock);
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(sr, tmpr, &sc->ranges, tree_node) {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(p, tmpb,
- &sr->all_publ, all_publ) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(p, tmp, &sr->all_publ, all_publ) {
tipc_service_remove_publ(net, sc, p->lower, p->upper,
- p->node, p->key);
+ p->node, p->key, &sr);
kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
}
+ rb_erase(&sr->tree_node, &sc->ranges);
+ kfree(sr);
}
hlist_del_init_rcu(&sc->service_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&sc->lock);
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 19:25 Jon Maloy [this message]
2018-04-18 17:48 ` [net 1/1] tipc: fix use-after-free in tipc_nametbl_stop David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523993142-7202-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--to=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au \
--cc=mohan.krishna.ghanta.krishnamurthy@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).