netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
To: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"eric.dumazet@gmail.com" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4_en: optimizes get_fixed_ipv6_csum()
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:56:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524783416.1731.1.camel@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419154929.25718-1-edumazet@google.com>

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 08:49 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> While trying to support CHECKSUM_COMPLETE for IPV6 fragments,
> I had to experiments various hacks in get_fixed_ipv6_csum().
> I must admit I could not find how to implement this :/
> 
> However, get_fixed_ipv6_csum() does a lot of redundant operations,
> calling csum_partial() twice.
> 
> First csum_partial() computes the checksum of saddr and daddr,
> put in @csum_pseudo_hdr. Undone later in the second csum_partial()
> computed on whole ipv6 header.
> 
> Then nexthdr is added once, added a second time, then substracted.
> 
> payload_len is added once, then substracted.
> 
> Really all this can be reduced to two add_csum(), to add back 6 bytes
> that were removed by mlx4 when providing hw_checksum in RX
> descriptor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
> ---
> Note: This patch, like other mlx4 patches can definitely wait
> Tariq approval, thanks !
> 

LGTM,

Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>

>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 21 ++++++++----------
> ---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> index
> 5c613c6663da51a4ae792eeb4d8956b54655786b..38c56fb6e5f5970f245dd56c38e
> 1fc63a9349a07 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> @@ -593,30 +593,25 @@ static int get_fixed_ipv4_csum(__wsum
> hw_checksum, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -/* In IPv6 packets, besides subtracting the pseudo header checksum,
> - * we also compute/add the IP header checksum which
> - * is not added by the HW.
> +/* In IPv6 packets, hw_checksum lacks 6 bytes from IPv6 header:
> + * 4 first bytes : priority, version, flow_lbl
> + * and 2 additional bytes : nexthdr, hop_limit.
>   */
>  static int get_fixed_ipv6_csum(__wsum hw_checksum, struct sk_buff
> *skb,
>  			       struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h)
>  {
>  	__u8 nexthdr = ipv6h->nexthdr;
> -	__wsum csum_pseudo_hdr = 0;
> +	__wsum temp;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(nexthdr == IPPROTO_FRAGMENT ||
>  		     nexthdr == IPPROTO_HOPOPTS ||
>  		     nexthdr == IPPROTO_SCTP))
>  		return -1;
> -	hw_checksum = csum_add(hw_checksum, (__force
> __wsum)htons(nexthdr));
>  
> -	csum_pseudo_hdr = csum_partial(&ipv6h->saddr,
> -				       sizeof(ipv6h->saddr) +
> sizeof(ipv6h->daddr), 0);
> -	csum_pseudo_hdr = csum_add(csum_pseudo_hdr, (__force
> __wsum)ipv6h->payload_len);
> -	csum_pseudo_hdr = csum_add(csum_pseudo_hdr,
> -				   (__force __wsum)htons(nexthdr));
> -
> -	skb->csum = csum_sub(hw_checksum, csum_pseudo_hdr);
> -	skb->csum = csum_add(skb->csum, csum_partial(ipv6h,
> sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), 0));
> +	/* priority, version, flow_lbl */
> +	temp = csum_add(hw_checksum, *(__wsum *)ipv6h);
> +	/* nexthdr and hop_limit */
> +	skb->csum = csum_add(temp, (__force __wsum)*(__be16
> *)&ipv6h->nexthdr);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-26 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-19 15:49 [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4_en: optimizes get_fixed_ipv6_csum() Eric Dumazet
2018-04-26 22:56 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2018-05-02 14:18   ` Tariq Toukan
2018-05-04  0:05     ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-04  1:52       ` David Miller
2018-05-04  2:10         ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-04 15:59           ` David Miller
2018-05-04 16:10             ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1524783416.1731.1.camel@mellanox.com \
    --to=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).