From: gfree.wind@vip.163.com
To: davem@davemloft.net, daniel@iogearbox.net,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@vip.163.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: Correct wrong skb_flow_limit check when enable RPS
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:28:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1525940884-21067-1-git-send-email-gfree.wind@vip.163.com> (raw)
From: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@vip.163.com>
The skb flow limit is implemented for each CPU independently. In the
current codes, the function skb_flow_limit gets the softnet_data by
this_cpu_ptr. But the target cpu of enqueue_to_backlog would be not
the current cpu when enable RPS. As the result, the skb_flow_limit checks
the stats of current CPU, while the skb is going to append the queue of
another CPU. It isn't the expected behavior.
Now pass the softnet_data as a param to softnet_data to make consistent.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@vip.163.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index af0558b..0f98eff 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3883,18 +3883,15 @@ static int rps_ipi_queued(struct softnet_data *sd)
int netdev_flow_limit_table_len __read_mostly = (1 << 12);
#endif
-static bool skb_flow_limit(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int qlen)
+static bool skb_flow_limit(struct softnet_data *sd, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int qlen)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT
struct sd_flow_limit *fl;
- struct softnet_data *sd;
unsigned int old_flow, new_flow;
if (qlen < (netdev_max_backlog >> 1))
return false;
- sd = this_cpu_ptr(&softnet_data);
-
rcu_read_lock();
fl = rcu_dereference(sd->flow_limit);
if (fl) {
@@ -3938,7 +3935,7 @@ static int enqueue_to_backlog(struct sk_buff *skb, int cpu,
if (!netif_running(skb->dev))
goto drop;
qlen = skb_queue_len(&sd->input_pkt_queue);
- if (qlen <= netdev_max_backlog && !skb_flow_limit(skb, qlen)) {
+ if (qlen <= netdev_max_backlog && !skb_flow_limit(sd, skb, qlen)) {
if (qlen) {
enqueue:
__skb_queue_tail(&sd->input_pkt_queue, skb);
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-10 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 8:28 gfree.wind [this message]
2018-05-10 13:02 ` [PATCH net] net: Correct wrong skb_flow_limit check when enable RPS Eric Dumazet
2018-05-11 0:18 ` Gao Feng
2018-05-11 0:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-11 1:29 ` Gao Feng
2018-05-11 3:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-11 6:20 ` Gao Feng
2018-05-11 13:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-11 14:44 ` Gao Feng
2018-05-11 14:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-05-14 1:26 ` Gao Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1525940884-21067-1-git-send-email-gfree.wind@vip.163.com \
--to=gfree.wind@vip.163.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox