From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: paul@mad-scientist.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" tryingtoifenslave a second interface to my bond
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 16:00:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15291.1241478051@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090504.120651.32573620.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
>Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 12:03:37 -0700
>
>> Paul Smith <paul@mad-scientist.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Jay/David/etc.;
>>>
>>>This patch is critical for me to properly use mode 6 (balance-alb)
>>>bonding; I assume it will be needed for others as well. I haven't
>>>checked to see if it's still necessary in 2.6.29/2.6.30, but I didn't
>>>notice it going into the latest 2.6.27.22, released today.
>>>
>>>Is this still unofficial? Is there an official patch on the horizon?
>>
>> David, please apply and queue for -stable:
>
>Greg just posted that there will be no further 2.6.27.x -stable
>releases after the one he just made.
Regardless of the -stable situation, the patch is still needed
for the current mainline (sorry if that wasn't clear). I checked it
against the current net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 trees, and it should apply
to either one.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-04 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-13 21:15 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a second interface to my bond Paul Smith
2009-04-14 16:01 ` Paul Smith
2009-04-14 21:29 ` Brian Haley
2009-04-15 1:12 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-04-15 3:23 ` David Miller
2009-04-15 5:29 ` Paul Smith
2009-04-15 16:56 ` Paul Smith
2009-04-15 18:11 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-04-15 18:39 ` Paul Smith
[not found] ` <1241397581.6499.658.camel@homebase.localnet>
2009-05-04 19:03 ` 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying toifenslave " Jay Vosburgh
2009-05-04 19:06 ` David Miller
2009-05-04 22:38 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-04 22:44 ` David Miller
2009-05-05 0:59 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-04 23:00 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2009-05-04 23:04 ` 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" tryingtoifenslave " David Miller
2009-05-04 23:05 ` 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying toifenslave " Ben Hutchings
2009-05-04 23:12 ` David Miller
2009-05-05 4:32 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15291.1241478051@death.nxdomain.ibm.com \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@mad-scientist.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).