From: xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com
To: jasowang@redhat.com
Cc: mst@redhat.com, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>,
Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao@didichuxing.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 05:57:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530536228-17462-4-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530536228-17462-1-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao@didichuxing.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 62bb8e8..2790959 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -429,6 +429,52 @@ static int vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
return vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
}
+static int sk_has_rx_data(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
+
+ if (sock->ops->peek_len)
+ return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
+
+ return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
+ bool rx)
+{
+ unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
+ unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
+ struct socket *sock;
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = rx ? tvq : rvq;
+
+ mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
+
+ vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+ sock = rvq->private_data;
+ busyloop_timeout = rx ? rvq->busyloop_timeout : tvq->busyloop_timeout;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
+ while (vhost_can_busy_poll(tvq->dev, endtime) &&
+ !(sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk)) &&
+ vhost_vq_avail_empty(tvq->dev, tvq))
+ cpu_relax();
+ preempt_enable();
+
+ if ((rx && !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq)) ||
+ (!rx && (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk)))) {
+ vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+ } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
+ vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+ vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
+}
+
+
static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_size,
@@ -621,16 +667,6 @@ static int peek_head_len(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq, struct sock *sk)
return len;
}
-static int sk_has_rx_data(struct sock *sk)
-{
- struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
-
- if (sock->ops->peek_len)
- return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
-
- return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
-}
-
static void vhost_rx_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
{
struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
@@ -645,39 +681,19 @@ static void vhost_rx_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk)
{
- struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
- struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
- struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
- unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
- int len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
+ struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
+ struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
- if (!len && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
- /* Flush batched heads first */
- vhost_rx_signal_used(rvq);
- /* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
- mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
- vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+ int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
- preempt_disable();
- endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
-
- while (vhost_can_busy_poll(&net->dev, endtime) &&
- !sk_has_rx_data(sk) &&
- vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
- cpu_relax();
-
- preempt_enable();
-
- if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
- vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
- else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
- vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
- vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
- }
+ if (!len && rnvq->vq.busyloop_timeout) {
+ /* Flush batched heads first */
+ vhost_rx_signal_used(rnvq);
- mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
+ /* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
+ vhost_net_busy_poll(net, &rnvq->vq, &tnvq->vq, true);
- len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
+ len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
}
return len;
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-02 12:57 [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop xiangxia.m.yue
2018-07-02 12:57 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] vhost: lock the vqs one by one xiangxia.m.yue
2018-07-02 12:57 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation xiangxia.m.yue
2018-07-02 12:57 ` xiangxia.m.yue [this message]
2018-07-03 2:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll() Jason Wang
2018-07-03 5:48 ` Tonghao Zhang
2018-07-03 5:55 ` Jason Wang
2018-07-04 1:40 ` Tonghao Zhang
2018-07-02 12:57 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path xiangxia.m.yue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1530536228-17462-4-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
--to=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zhangtonghao@didichuxing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox