From: Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davejwatson@fb.com, aviadye@mellanox.com,
borisp@mellanox.com, saeedm@mellanox.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 06/18] tls: Split decrypt_skb to two functions
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:33:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531481632-12335-7-git-send-email-borisp@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531481632-12335-1-git-send-email-borisp@mellanox.com>
Previously, decrypt_skb also updated the TLS context.
Now, decrypt_skb only decrypts the payload using the current context,
while decrypt_skb_update also updates the state.
Later, in the tls_device Rx flow, we will use decrypt_skb directly.
Signed-off-by: Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
---
include/net/tls.h | 2 ++
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
index 5dcd808..49b8922 100644
--- a/include/net/tls.h
+++ b/include/net/tls.h
@@ -390,6 +390,8 @@ int tls_proccess_cmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
unsigned char *record_type);
void tls_register_device(struct tls_device *device);
void tls_unregister_device(struct tls_device *device);
+int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct scatterlist *sgout);
struct sk_buff *tls_validate_xmit_skb(struct sock *sk,
struct net_device *dev,
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 3bd7c14..99d0347 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
{
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
- struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
struct aead_request *aead_req;
int ret;
@@ -74,18 +73,6 @@ static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
ret = crypto_wait_req(crypto_aead_decrypt(aead_req), &ctx->async_wait);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
-
- rxm->offset += tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size;
- rxm->full_len -= tls_ctx->rx.overhead_size;
- tls_advance_record_sn(sk, &tls_ctx->rx);
-
- ctx->decrypted = true;
-
- ctx->saved_data_ready(sk);
-
-out:
kfree(aead_req);
return ret;
}
@@ -670,8 +657,29 @@ static struct sk_buff *tls_wait_data(struct sock *sk, int flags,
return skb;
}
-static int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct scatterlist *sgout)
+static int decrypt_skb_update(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct scatterlist *sgout)
+{
+ struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
+ struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
+ struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
+ int err = 0;
+
+ err = decrypt_skb(sk, skb, sgout);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ rxm->offset += tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size;
+ rxm->full_len -= tls_ctx->rx.overhead_size;
+ tls_advance_record_sn(sk, &tls_ctx->rx);
+ ctx->decrypted = true;
+ ctx->saved_data_ready(sk);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct scatterlist *sgout)
{
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
@@ -821,7 +829,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
if (err < 0)
goto fallback_to_reg_recv;
- err = decrypt_skb(sk, skb, sgin);
+ err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, sgin);
for (; pages > 0; pages--)
put_page(sg_page(&sgin[pages]));
if (err < 0) {
@@ -830,7 +838,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
}
} else {
fallback_to_reg_recv:
- err = decrypt_skb(sk, skb, NULL);
+ err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL);
if (err < 0) {
tls_err_abort(sk, EBADMSG);
goto recv_end;
@@ -901,7 +909,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
}
if (!ctx->decrypted) {
- err = decrypt_skb(sk, skb, NULL);
+ err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL);
if (err < 0) {
tls_err_abort(sk, EBADMSG);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-13 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 11:33 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/18] TLS offload rx, netdev & mlx5 Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/18] net: Add decrypted field to skb Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/18] net: Add TLS RX offload feature Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/18] net: Add TLS rx resync NDO Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/18] tcp: Don't coalesce decrypted and encrypted SKBs Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/18] tls: Refactor tls_offload variable names Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` Boris Pismenny [this message]
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/18] tls: Split tls_sw_release_resources_rx Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/18] tls: Fill software context without allocation Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/18] tls: Add rx inline crypto offload Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/18] tls: Fix zerocopy_from_iter iov handling Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/18] net/mlx5e: TLS, refactor variable names Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/18] net/mlx5: Accel, add TLS rx offload routines Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 13/18] net/mlx5e: TLS, add innova rx support Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 14/18] net/mlx5e: TLS, add Innova TLS rx data path Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 15/18] net/mlx5e: TLS, add software statistics Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 16/18] net/mlx5e: TLS, build TLS netdev from capabilities Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 17/18] net/mlx5: Accel, add common metadata functions Boris Pismenny
2018-07-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 18/18] net/mlx5e: IPsec, fix byte count in CQE Boris Pismenny
2018-07-16 7:17 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 00/18] TLS offload rx, netdev & mlx5 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531481632-12335-7-git-send-email-borisp@mellanox.com \
--to=borisp@mellanox.com \
--cc=aviadye@mellanox.com \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).