From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <gordan.mihaljevic@dektech.com.au>,
<tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>, <hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au>,
<jon.maloy@ericsson.com>, <canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au>,
<ying.xue@windriver.com>, <tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [net-next 1/1] tipc: make link capability update thread safe
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:50:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531936206-3118-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com> (raw)
The commit referred to below introduced an update of the link
capabilities field that is not safe. Given the recently added
feature to remove idle node and link items after 5 minutes, there
is a small risk that the update will happen at the very moment the
targeted link is being removed. To avoid this we have to perform
the update inside the node item's write lock protection.
Fixes: 9012de508956 ("tipc: add sequence number check for link STATE messages")
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
---
net/tipc/node.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c
index 52fd80b..3819ab1 100644
--- a/net/tipc/node.c
+++ b/net/tipc/node.c
@@ -370,13 +370,17 @@ static struct tipc_node *tipc_node_create(struct net *net, u32 addr,
spin_lock_bh(&tn->node_list_lock);
n = tipc_node_find(net, addr);
if (n) {
+ if (n->capabilities == capabilities)
+ goto exit;
/* Same node may come back with new capabilities */
+ write_lock_bh(&n->lock);
n->capabilities = capabilities;
for (bearer_id = 0; bearer_id < MAX_BEARERS; bearer_id++) {
l = n->links[bearer_id].link;
if (l)
tipc_link_update_caps(l, capabilities);
}
+ write_unlock_bh(&n->lock);
goto exit;
}
n = kzalloc(sizeof(*n), GFP_ATOMIC);
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 17:50 Jon Maloy [this message]
2018-07-20 19:36 ` [net-next 1/1] tipc: make link capability update thread safe David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1531936206-3118-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--to=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gordan.mihaljevic@dektech.com.au \
--cc=hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox