From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: avoid unnecessary sock_flag() check when enable timestamp
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:57:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1533527822-3324-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
The sock_flag() check is alreay inside sock_enable_timestamp(), so it is
unnecessary checking it in the caller.
void sock_enable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, int flag)
{
if (!sock_flag(sk, flag)) {
...
}
}
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
net/compat.c | 6 ++----
net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
index 7242cce..3b2105f 100644
--- a/net/compat.c
+++ b/net/compat.c
@@ -466,8 +466,7 @@ int compat_sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
ctv = (struct compat_timeval __user *) userstamp;
err = -ENOENT;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
tv = ktime_to_timeval(sk->sk_stamp);
if (tv.tv_sec == -1)
return err;
@@ -494,8 +493,7 @@ int compat_sock_get_timestampns(struct sock *sk, struct timespec __user *usersta
ctv = (struct compat_timespec __user *) userstamp;
err = -ENOENT;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
ts = ktime_to_timespec(sk->sk_stamp);
if (ts.tv_sec == -1)
return err;
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index e31233f..3730eb8 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2900,8 +2900,8 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
{
struct timeval tv;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
tv = ktime_to_timeval(sk->sk_stamp);
if (tv.tv_sec == -1)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -2916,8 +2916,8 @@ int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
int sock_get_timestampns(struct sock *sk, struct timespec __user *userstamp)
{
struct timespec ts;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
ts = ktime_to_timespec(sk->sk_stamp);
if (ts.tv_sec == -1)
return -ENOENT;
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-06 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-06 3:57 Yafang Shao [this message]
2018-08-06 17:43 ` [PATCH net-next] net: avoid unnecessary sock_flag() check when enable timestamp David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1533527822-3324-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox